Adjoining- Group Project/Meeting

During my undergrad, one of my professors assigned the class into groups of 8/9 people. We were given the task of coming up with a devastating event and to report on it. The details that we were supposed to include was the location, how devastating was it, how many people did it affect/kill, what did the people do as of a result of it, and what were some suggestions on how people could've been better prepared. There were many roles to be handeled; such as research all the information, document and outline it online in the discussion board so your fellow group members could view as well, and type the whole paper up. The last role was a collaborative part of answering any questions from other groups and or the professor.

A few of my classmates lived in or near the surrounding area, so they were able to provide detailed information. A few of the negative interactions that took place were, not everbody participated in the actual research of the information, not did everybody participate in reviewing each part and finalizing the main paper. A few classmates popped in every 2/3 days, i'm not sure for what since they didn't provided any useful information. Nevertheless when peer evaluations came around, everybody "expected" a good report. However, some classmates were let down when they received theirs and it wasn't what they thought it would be!

At the beginning of the group I announced to my partners on the group's discussion that I'd be leaving to go on vacation midway through the week; however I would have all of my assigned work completed and submitted for them to have and include in the report for when it was turned in. I also emailed my teacher letting her know of my preplanned absence beginning on that Thursday throughout the next week (I was going on a cruise). So the beginning of the week went as normal with assigning roles and splitting up areas for research, deciding what day and times would be best to meet on the discussion board and compile all that we had found thus far, etc. Before I left, there were three discussions announced; the first three/nine people logged on, second nobody showed up except me and one other student, and third was rescheduled because everybody had posted that it was a bad time. So needless to say they had about 2 or 3 more after I left. However, during the second meeting of me and one other I posted and "attached" my whole findings and gave permission to make any corrections or add-ins that they felt necessary, but pretty much that was my work. I came back from vacation and checked my grade, to my surprise I had received an "D" for the class. After emailing and the professor and checking over the group's evaluation report they had reported that I barely attended any meetings and I did not deliver nor produce any work in assisting with the project. I was shocked but I knew I had done so and would not stop until it was proven. I sent the professor the attachment and also I had him take a look at my groups discussion board where I posted my work. What apparently happened was, they used my work as if they found It themselves and not given me credit for delivering it ahead of time, thinking since I wouldn't be there during peer evaluations I wouldn't notice. Needless to say, everything was in black and white and my grade became changed to an "A".

I think one think that could be improved is communication apprehension, so if there is someone who doesn't feel comfortable reporting or speaking/sharing their information in fron of others, they can email there portion to another student and he/she can then post it. (O'Hair & Weimann, 2012 ) That was the worst group I had ever worked with, so the adjoining process was easy for me, because I never ever wanted to work with either one of them again. I had lost all trust for them, even if we ended up in another class together, it would be strictly about classwork.

Resource
O'Hair, D. & Wiemann, M. (2012) Real Communication